Three little words shaping how annual leave is calculated

Three little words shaping how annual leave is calculated

annual leave

Following on from our last article on annual leave entitlements, this one looks at the other side of the leave equation, the payment.

Leave entitlements have two key components: time and money. The last article focused on time (leave balances).

This one focuses on money, the leave pay rates that determine how much an employee is entitled to when they take time off.

And it all starts with three little words: the greater of.

These words are the cornerstone of the Holidays Act whenever annual leave is paid.

Whether the payment is for annual holidays, leave taken in advance, cashed-out entitlement, or termination pay, the rule is the same: pay the employee the greater of Ordinary Weekly Pay (OWP) or Average Weekly Earnings (AWE).

On paper it sounds simple. In practice, it is anything but. Let’s break it down.

At a glance: five things to know

  1. Annual leave pay must be calculated using the greater of OWP or AWE.
  2. OWP includes more than just base pay; allowances and benefits may apply.
  3. AWE averages 52 weeks of gross earnings, but deciding what’s in or out is critical.
  4. The Holidays Act does not define “leave accrual,” creating common payroll errors.
  5. Holiday pay must be made before leave starts, unless agreed otherwise.

“The three little words, ‘the greater of’, are easy to say but difficult to apply correctly.”

Ordinary Weekly Pay (OWP)

At first glance, OWP looks straightforward. It is the employee’s “ordinary weekly pay” at the start of the holiday. But what exactly does that include?

  • Is it just base salary?
  • What about regular allowances?
  • Does overtime count?
  • What if the employee receives board and lodging?

The answer: yes, these can all be included.

This is where many businesses get caught. If you are paying a regular allowance, and your contract does not specifically say it stops during leave, that allowance continues to be paid on top of the leave payment. At the same time, it is also included in the OWP calculation. The result? The employee receives the allowance twice. Payroll professionals call this “double-dipping” and it often happens because payroll was not consulted when allowances were introduced.

What’s excluded from OWP?

The Act carves out certain types of payments:

  • Irregular payments
  • One-off payments
  • Discretionary payments

But be cautious. What you think is discretionary may not meet the legal definition. A labour inspector could rule that a payment you assumed was discretionary is in fact regular, and therefore should be included. Section 8(c) of the Holidays Act provides the framework, but interpretation can be risky.

Calculating OWP when it’s unclear

If OWP cannot be determined because of excluded payments, a formula must be applied:

Gross earnings for the last 4 weeks, less excluded payments, divided by 4.

There is also provision for an employer and employee to agree on a special OWP rate, as long as that rate is equal to or greater than the statutory calculation. Importantly, you cannot simply use the base salary in the employment agreement unless it meets the definition.

And if all else fails, Section 11 of the Holidays Act allows a labour inspector to determine OWP. Most employers would prefer to avoid this outcome, as it suggests payroll processes are not compliant.

Key question: How is your system calculating OWP? And how does it handle fortnightly and monthly employees?

“Average Weekly Earnings smooth out fluctuations, but only if you know exactly what counts as gross earnings.”

Average Weekly Earnings (AWE)

AWE is designed to capture fluctuations over time. The calculation is:

Gross earnings over the last 52 weeks ÷ 52.

This method smooths out irregularities, but raises another question: what counts as gross earnings?

  • Are bonuses included?
  • Are allowances included?
  • Does a seasonal top-up or Christmas cash bonus fall into the calculation?

These decisions matter. Misclassifying payments can either short-change employees or overpay them. Both outcomes create risk, financial for the employer and compliance exposure if challenged by a labour inspector.

Another common issue arises with employees paid fortnightly or monthly. Payroll systems must be able to apply the same rules consistently, regardless of pay cycle. A system that averages incorrectly or overlooks certain earnings can cause significant underpayments.

Leave accrual and payments

This is where the Holidays Act leaves employers with less guidance. The Act does not define “leave accrual.” It only defines leave entitlement and leave taken in advance.

Most payroll systems show both entitlement and accrual balances, but many treat them the same way at payout. That can be problematic.

Here’s why:

  • If leave is taken in advance, it must be paid at the greater of OWP or AWE.
  • If the employee later resigns, the accrual time is ignored. Instead, the employer recalculates pay based on 8% of gross earnings since the last leave anniversary, less any leave in advance already paid.

This can lead to a deficit if the earlier advance payment was higher than the 8% calculation.

Best practice for accruals

  • Treat accrual and entitlement as separate balances.
  • Where possible, configure your payroll system to record gross earnings since the last anniversary, so the 8% calculation can be applied correctly. Few systems handle this well, but it is the most accurate approach.

“Holiday pay isn’t just about calculation, timing matters too.”

Final reminders

Holiday pay is not just about calculation, timing matters too.

Why this matters

Annual leave payments may seem straightforward on the surface, but the reality is complex. Missteps create compliance risk, employee disputes, and potential financial liability. Systems must be configured correctly, contracts must be clear, and payroll professionals must be involved when allowances or new payment types are introduced.

“The greater of” may sound simple, but applying it correctly is where most payroll mistakes happen. Ensuring your payroll system interprets them correctly is one of the most important steps in building a compliant, trusted workplace.

Written by: Dawn Grant

Key Takeaways:

  • Three little words – “the greater of” – drive how leave is paid.
  • Payroll missteps often happen around allowances, discretionary payments, and accrual.
  • Employers must calculate OWP and AWE correctly to stay compliant.
  • Accurate system setup is essential to avoid overpayments or underpayments.
  • Compliance is not optional  –  mistakes can leave employers exposed.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is Ordinary Weekly Pay (OWP) and what counts?

OWP reflects what an employee would normally earn in a week, including regular payments such as salary, wages, and certain allowances.

2. What is Average Weekly Earnings (AWE) and how is it calculated?

AWE is calculated by averaging an employee’s gross earnings over the previous 52 weeks, divided by the number of weeks worked.

3. Why is the “greater of” rule important and where does it apply?

New Zealand legislation requires annual leave to be paid at the greater of OWP or AWE. This protects employees and is a common area of payroll non-compliance.

4. What should employers do to ensure correct payment?

Employers should review payroll configurations, validate calculations, and regularly test outcomes against legislative requirements.

5. Can Alxemy help with compliance and system setup for this?

Yes. Alxemy supports Holidays Act reviews, remediation programmes, and system configuration to ensure leave calculations are accurate and compliant.
Not less than 4 weeks paid annual holidays

Not less than 4 weeks paid annual holidays

Annual Holiday

When simple words cause big problems

“Not less than 4 weeks’ paid annual holidays.” – How do these eight simple words cause so much confusion?

These eight words are taken from section 16 of the New Zealand Holidays Act.

The complete section reads:

(1) After the end of each completed 12 months of continuous employment, an employee is entitled to not less than 4 weeks’ of paid annual holidays.

Seems simple, eh? Maybe not so much.

Truth about 4 weeks’ leave…

  1. “Accrued leave” isn’t in the Holidays Act – only entitlement is.
  2. Unpaid leave can still count as continuous employment.
  3. ACC injury leave counts, even without working all year.
  4. Leave in hours may not equal 4 full weeks of time. 
  5. If there’s no agreement, a Labour Inspector may step in.

“What looks simple in law often becomes complex in payroll.”

What’s missing? The myth of “accrued leave”

Let’s start with what isn’t in Section 16: accrued leave.

If you searched the Holidays Act 2003 for the terms “accrued leave” or “leave accrual”, you’d come up empty. Neither term appears in the legislation.

Yet most payroll systems use these terms to describe leave earned during the first 12 months of employment – and in every 12-month period after that. Some systems even show two leave balances:

  • Leave accrued
  • Leave entitled

But here’s the thing: only “leave entitled” is legally recognised. “Leave accrued” is a system construct – not a legislative one.

“Accrued leave might be in your system, but it’s not in the law.”

So what’s the problem?

If there’s no mention of leave accrual in legislation, but your system displays leave accrued, how do you know it’s correct?

And if leave is accruing – how is it accruing? In weeks? In most systems, leave accrual is in hours, sometimes in days, and possibly in weeks if you’re lucky.

How does this accrual work for employees with varied hours? Is it based on hours worked – also known as proportional accrual?

And how does that get translated into a 4-week entitlement once the 12-month mark is reached?

Understanding “continuous employment”

Let’s go back to Section 16 – “each completed 12 months of continuous employment.”

Let’s review what continuous employment means.

At first glance, it seems simple: work 12 months, get 4 weeks of leave. Easy, eh? Yeah, nah.

What happens if an employee takes time off during those 12 months? Is employment still considered continuous? In most cases, yes.

Even some types of unpaid leave are considered continuous employment – think unpaid sick leave, unpaid bereavement leave, unpaid jury duty, etc.

Only unpaid leave not related to these categories, and greater than one week, is excluded from the definition of continuous employment.

So what does your system do in those cases?

  • Does it push out the leave entitlement date (anniversary date)?
  • Reduce the divisor?
  • Or… does it do nothing at all?

The ACC scenario: an easy one to miss

Here’s one to look out for: unpaid injury leave while an employee is receiving weekly compensation from ACC.

If an employee returns after a period of injury leave, however long, the time away is still considered continuous employment.

That means the employee may be entitled to 4 weeks of annual leave, even if they haven’t worked at all during the past 12 months.

As the company isn’t paying the employee, and the role may have been filled by someone else, this often drops off the radar. Confusion and frustration follow when the employee returns and claims their 4 weeks of leave.

Surely they’re not entitled? Oh yes, they are.

But what is “4 weeks of leave” really?

Here’s the big question – what exactly does 4 weeks of leave mean in your system?

Is the balance stored in hours or in weeks?

If it’s in hours, how do you know the correct number of hours have been converted into the equivalent of 4 weeks?

Have the employee’s regular hours changed in those 12 months?

  • Has a full-time employee gone part-time?
  • Has a part-time employee gone full-time?

Are the hours now more or less than the equivalent of 4 weeks?

So what’s the problem?

If there’s no mention of leave accrual in legislation, but your system displays leave accrued, how do you know it’s correct?

And if leave is accruing – how is it accruing? In weeks? In most systems, leave accrual is in hours, sometimes in days, and possibly in weeks if you’re lucky.

How does this accrual work for employees with varied hours? Is it based on hours worked – also known as proportional accrual?

And how does that get translated into a 4-week entitlement once the 12-month mark is reached?

“If your system’s logic hasn’t been reviewed in years, now’s the time to check before someone else does.”

Section 17: Agreement (or disagreement)

Section 17 of the Holidays Act explains how the entitlement to 4 weeks’ annual holidays can be met. The recommended approach? Employer and employee should agree on how the 4-week entitlement is fulfilled.

But who actually has those conversations?

In most cases, it’s left up to the payroll system to define the 4 weeks of annual holidays. But is that definition correct? Are you relying on a flawed system?

What happens when there’s no agreement?

Even worse, under Section 17(2), if the employer and employee can’t agree, then a Labour Inspector can make the determination.

Yikes.

The Labour Inspector may also refer to Section 12 of the Act, which defines an otherwise working day. Are these otherwise working days accurately recorded in your time and attendance system? If not, then the door is open for the Labour Inspector to dig even deeper – something you want to avoid.

Final note: payment is a separate issue

And don’t get me started on payment for those 4 week, that’s a subject for another article.

So…eight simple words that cause so much consternation and angst – not less than 4 weeks paid annual holidays.

So… is your system compliant?

Is your system compliant? The question isn’t whether you trust your system –  it’s whether your system actually aligns with the Holidays Act.

A quick compliance audit can:

  • Review your accrual settings
  • Check anniversary date handling
  • Confirm how “4 weeks” is calculated in real-world terms

Ask us about a Holidays Act audit today.

Written By: Dawn Grant

Key Takeaways:

  • Accrued leave is not legislated: It’s a payroll convention, not a legal standard. Leave entitlement only legally exists after 12 months of continuous employment.
  • Continuous employment includes more than you think: Many types of unpaid leave – including sick, bereavement, jury, and injury leave don’t break the 12-month cycle.
  • Systems often get it wrong: Leave balances in hours or days may not equate correctly to 4 weeks, especially for variable-hour or part-time employees.
  • Disagreements can escalate: If no agreement is reached between employer and employee, a Labour Inspector can step in – potentially exposing system flaws.
  • An audit can help: Regular compliance checks are essential to avoid future issues and ensure employees are getting their full entitlements.
Payroll Chaos? Why Payroll Support Isn’t Just a ‘Nice-to-Have’

Payroll Chaos? Why Payroll Support Isn’t Just a ‘Nice-to-Have’

payroll support

Disaster Strikes.

It’s Monday morning. You’ve just arrived at the office, coffee in hand, when your phone pings. It’s your payroll administrator – and the news isn’t good. They’re in hospital, out of action, and payroll is due tomorrow.

You pause. Payroll can’t wait. People are expecting their pay to land on Tuesday morning. You look around the office. Who else can step in? The answer: no one. There’s no documented process. No handover. No one trained to take over. The knowledge lives with one person – and now they’re unavailable.

Suddenly, you’re facing a very real dilemma. Your options?

  • Drive the payroll administrator’s laptop to the hospital and ask them to process payroll from their bed.
  • Try to figure out the payroll system yourself.
  • Call in an external payroll support team and hope they can help – fast.

It’s a scenario few organisations plan for… until it happens. But it happens more often than you’d expect.

Despite payroll being critical to compliance, staff wellbeing, and legal obligations, it’s often handled by just one person. And when they’re suddenly unavailable, there’s no easy fix.

What You Need to Know…..

  1. Payroll disruptions are more common than you think and most businesses aren’t prepared.

  2. Depending on one person is risky especially when no one else knows the process.

  3. Payroll is more than admin. It’s compliance-heavy and must be handled with care.

  4. External support provides continuity which is essential during absences or peak periods.

  5. Documentation matters yet it’s often missing until it’s too late.

It’s a scenario few organisations plan for… until it happens. And by then, it’s already too late.

Payroll Is Business-Critical. So Why Isn’t It Treated That Way?

Payroll isn’t just a routine back-office task. It’s the process that keeps your people paid, your business compliant, and your reputation intact.

Yet in many organisations, payroll sits precariously on the shoulders of one person. If they’re sick, on holiday, or suddenly unavailable – there’s no safety net.

Even worse, the payroll process itself is rarely documented. That means there’s no guide, checklist, or fallback plan. Just one person’s working memory. And when they’re gone, so is all that operational knowledge.

We’ve seen it first-hand. We’ve supported organisations where multiple payroll staff left at the same time, leaving no documentation behind. With no clear process and no one trained to step in, payroll ground to a halt. We were brought in to help map out the workflow, restore continuity, and get things back on track. It was a stressful moment that could have been avoided with a simple backup plan.

The Hidden Complexity of Payroll

On the surface, payroll might seem like a predictable task. But dig deeper and you’ll find:

  • Complex legislative requirements like the Holidays Act and PAYE calculations.
  • Confidential employee data that demands strict privacy controls.
  • System quirks and workarounds that only your payroll person understands.
  • High-volume periods such as EOFY or new system rollouts that stretch even seasoned teams.

It’s not something you can hand off to ‘whoever’s free.’ And it’s certainly not something you want to get wrong.

When payroll fails, the consequences are immediate:

  • Staff aren’t paid correctly – or at all.
  • Compliance risks snowballing.
  • Trust is eroded.
  • And if a worst-case scenario unfolds, you could be looking at media scrutiny, legal issues, and reputational damage.

Payroll Support Services: The Third Option (and the Smart One)

This is where payroll support services come in.

Whether you’re facing a short-term absence or need long-term assistance, a payroll support partner like Alxemy offers:

  • Continuity – ensuring payroll is processed accurately and on time, no matter the disruption.
  • System familiarity – working within your current systems and processes, not overhauling them.
  • Compliance confidence – meeting legislative requirements without putting internal teams at risk.
  • Scalable capacity – providing extra hands during high-volume or high-pressure periods.

Think of it like business continuity insurance – except it’s proactive, cost-effective, and people-focused.

    Why Documentation Matters (And Why So Few Have It)

    Another overlooked risk? Lack of documentation.

    Most businesses don’t formally document their payroll processes. Not because they’re careless, but because no one thinks to – until disaster hits. It’s an invisible liability hiding in plain sight.

    A good payroll support service can help here too. At Alxemy, we’ve worked with clients to:

    • Map out payroll processes step-by-step.
    • Identify single points of failure.
    • Build out backup plans.
    • Train secondary resources.

    That way, even if someone is unavailable, the show can go on – and staff get paid without panic.

      “The most overlooked risk in payroll isn’t a system failure – it’s the absence of a documented process when you need it most.”

       Be Ready Before You Have to Be

      We’re not saying your payroll person is going to disappear tomorrow. But wouldn’t you rather be prepared?

      Payroll support isn’t just for emergencies. It’s about resilience, trust, and peace of mind – for your business and your people.

      So next time you ask: “What would we do if our payroll person wasn’t here?”  –  don’t default to unrealistic options.

      Avoid option 1: (hospital-bound payroll).
      Avoid option 2: (winging it solo).
      Choose option 3: a trusted payroll support partner who’s ready when you need them most.

      Need Help With Payroll Contingency or Coverage?

      Whether you’re preparing for leave cover, navigating a high-volume period, or simply want to reduce your payroll risk – Alxemy can help.

      Talk to us today about building a resilient, documented payroll function – so you’re never caught off guard.

      Visit www.alxemy.co.nz/payroll-processing
      Or Contact Us for a confidential chat.

      Key Takeaways:

      • Payroll is critical and complex – yet often managed by just one person, with no backup plan in place.
      • Unexpected absences can derail payroll – leading to missed payments, compliance breaches, and loss of employee trust.
      • Most payroll processes aren’t documented – creating serious business risk if the sole administrator is unavailable.
      • External payroll support services offer continuity, compliance, and peace of mind – whether for short-term cover or ongoing support.
      Alxemy undertakes a Sky-high payroll project

      Alxemy undertakes a Sky-high payroll project

      Alxemy undertakes a Sky-high payroll project
      With a vision to strengthen their HR recruitment systems and employee experience, Sky TV New Zealand engaged ELMO, an HR and payroll solution provider to strengthen their talent acquisition capabilities, remuneration, performance management and succession in addition to refining their financial control systems

      Once the implementation got underway, complexities of the project came to lightas the scope expanded, and feedback from the payroll team indicated unanticipated challenges mixing their new HR solution with their current payroll provider, PayGlobal during transition. Furthermore, the new payroll solution accompanying ELMO HR, brought with it some challenges of its own.

      To minimise the risks they brought Alxemy onboard to support the implementation project and bolster Sky TV’s internal resources, affording them the ability to manage both BAU as well as the implementation project.

      Alxemy proved a perfect payroll partner for Sky New Zealand – and continue to be – because they:

      • Have extensive project management skills and expertise industry wide.
      • Have the ability to work through and around the complexities of a large enterprise level system integration project, streamlining HR and payroll processes.
      • Could advocate for Sky New Zealand and develop a new business continuity plan to future-proof Sky’s payroll processes.
      The project’s end result? Sky New Zealand now have their HR and payroll systems collaborating seamlessly with one another, and have cemented an ongoing relationship with Alxemy.

      A solution that ticks all the boxes

      Sky New Zealand has a head count of over 600 people. As a national broadcaster, providing media services countrywide, and employing a range of full time & part time staff and contractors, having a centralised, efficient, and compliant HR and payroll platform in place was a must.

      With a robust solution they would be able to attract talent, manage workflows more efficiently and meet the needs of their people, all the while simplifying HR & payroll processes across the board.
      Knowing this, Sky New Zealand went out to market to find a solution that met all their requirements. After an in-depth selection process, they chose ELMO as a full end to end solution in HR.

      Seeking a trusted hand

      As can be the case, with enterprise level system implementation projects, there can be unexpected complexities along the way. These complexities can become amplified and extensive when you add the integration of multiple systems to the scope.

      With a small internal team managing the project, Sky New Zealand recognised early on that they were not going to be able to do this themselves. And so it was that they sought external expertise to smoothen the journey and ensure compliance, alongside a streamlining of processes.

      Alxemy steps in as Sky’s payroll partner

      Because of their strong reputation, Sky’s Head of People Operations Property & Safety, Alex Howieson, reached out to the team at Alxemy for payroll support.

      Working in tandem with Sky’s Payroll Manager Anu Balasooriya, Alxemy and Sky worked closely with the team, actioning agreement requirements and adjustments in accordance with Sky’s business processes.

      Over several months the Alxemy team implemented and executed systematic manual workarounds to address any calculations and processes for which the system did not cater, and worked internally to assist the payroll team with payroll two-days a fortnight.

      As part of the project, Alxemy also assisted with delivering:

      • a greement requirements
      • reporting for the finance team
      • streamlining of all payroll processes
      • automation of processes where possible

      Alxemy didn’t just sign off on project completion, today they continue to provide payroll support when required.

      Future-proofing payroll for Sky

      Trust and exceptional service resonated across the project. Sky’s Head of People Operations Peroprty & Safety, Alex Howison was highly impressed with Alxemy’s professionalism – their service culture an essential key to project success.

      “Alxemy went above and beyond the call of duty and superseded our expectations,” says Alex. “Their profound expertise, exceptional organisational qualities continue to serve us beyond implementation. I can’t identify any areas for them to improve upon.”

      And the trust and understanding between Sky and Alxemy has expanded beyond individuals to a companywide relationship.

      “We now have streamlined processes, a business continuity plan, and Alxemy are helping us two-days every fortnight which means our payroll manager now has the ability and confidence to take time off. We’re in a safe pair of hands.”

      Conclusion

      Sky New Zealand now benefits from a robust, streamlined, and compliant HR and payroll system, with Alxemy continuing to provide invaluable support. This partnership not only resolved immediate challenges but also equipped Sky with the tools and systems needed for long-term success.