 
							
					
															Protected: RDP vs ADP: That is the Question
Password Protected
To view this protected post, enter the password below:
Payroll and Technology Experts: 50 Years of Proven Excellence.
 
							
					
															To view this protected post, enter the password below:
 
							
					
															To view this protected post, enter the password below:
 
							
					
															 
			On 23 September 2025, the Minister for Workplace Relations, Brooke van Velden, announced that the Cabinet had agreed to repeal the Holidays Act 2003 and replace it with a brand-new framework: the Employment Leave Act.
This is a significant development for New Zealand employers and employees alike. The Holidays Act has long been criticised as overly complex and difficult to administer, with payroll errors frequently arising from its inconsistent calculations. The Employment Leave Act aims to simplify entitlements and create a more transparent, hours-based system.
While the announcement signals a clear intention to reform, the new law still has a long journey before it takes effect. Here’s what we know so far, what’s changing, and what businesses should do to prepare.
The Cabinet has confirmed several key pillars of the proposed Employment Leave Act (The Beehive):
The Minister has confirmed the goal to pass the Act within this parliamentary term remains on track, with a 24-month implementation period after passage (The Beehive).
This is a Government bill backed by Cabinet, making passage highly likely – but details may still shift during the Select Committee stage.
We are currently at the post-Cabinet policy decision stage. The Bill has not yet been introduced to Parliament. MBIE’s update confirms Cabinet’s decisions and notes the Bill will now be drafted and then introduced, triggering the official Select Committee process (MBIE).
If introduced in the coming months and given a normal Select Committee timeframe, mid–late 2026 is the earliest realistic passage date (The Beehive, MBIE). The Act would then have a 24-month implementation window, meaning practical go-live for most sectors in 2028.
The schooling sector will have up to 10 years to transition, given the complexity of its centralised payroll system (The Beehive).
Employers must keep applying the current Holidays Act until the new Employment Leave Act is fully passed and implemented.
Replacing the Holidays Act isn’t just a technical change, it will reshape how businesses manage leave and how employees access their entitlements.
Employers and payroll providers have long struggled with the Holidays Act, particularly with variable-hour and casual workers. These complexities have led to widespread remediation programmes, with many businesses still correcting errors today.
The proposed hours-based system aims to:
Some of the main risks for employers include:
The Government has signaled a 24-month implementation period to give organisations time to adapt (The Beehive).
Moving to an hours-based system could finally deliver the clarity and consistency employers and employees have been waiting for.
It’s natural to be sceptical. Past reviews, including one in 2023–2024, failed to deliver change. But this time momentum looks stronger:
That said, risks remain:
Initial reporting suggests debate will centre on issues like hours-based sick leave and the 12.5% compensation payment (NZ Herald). But overall, the core direction is Government-led and positioned as simplification.
The Holidays Act 2003 remains in force. Nothing has legally changed yet, and no new rules apply until the proposed Employment Leave Act is introduced, debated, passed, and then given effect after a transition period. That process will take time, and final details may still shift.
However, employers should stay proactive so they’re not caught off guard. The following steps can help organisations prepare in the coming months:
Bottom line: Stay the course under the current Holidays Act, but start preparing quietly in the background. This ensures that when the Employment Leave Act does come into effect—most likely several years away—you’ll be ready to implement with minimal disruption.
Preparation today is about awareness, not action. By staying informed and planning carefully, organisations will be ready if and when the Employment Leave Act becomes law.
At Alxemy, we help organisations navigate payroll, workforce, and compliance change with confidence. While the Employment Leave Act is not yet law, aligning your foundations now will make the eventual transition smoother. Our services most relevant to this context include:
Payroll Remediation & Compliance
Many businesses are still working through Holidays Act compliance issues. Fixing these now reduces risk and places your organisation in a stronger position for any future transition.
System Health Checks
Our fixed-price health checks identify whether your current payroll and HR systems are equipped to handle potential reforms—such as hourly accruals, compensation payments, or new leave categories—while also uncovering inefficiencies and compliance gaps.
Strategic Systems Advice
We guide you on whether to enhance your current platform or plan for a longer-term shift. This includes reviewing vendor roadmaps, integration options, and scalability for future requirements.
Managed Payroll & Systems Administration
For organisations looking to reduce risk and overhead, we provide fully managed services that combine payroll processing with system administration, ensuring updates, compliance changes, and employee queries are handled seamlessly.
Implementation & Change Support
If the new Act is passed, employers will face policy, system, and process changes. Our consulting team is experienced in delivering large-scale implementations, staff training, and change management to minimise disruption.
We help organisations balance compliance today with preparedness for tomorrow.
1. When will the Employment Leave Act take effect?
The Bill hasn’t been introduced yet. If passed this term, the earliest practical start for most sectors is 2028 after a 24-month implementation window.
2. What happens to the Holidays Act in the meantime?
The Holidays Act 2003 remains in force until the new law is fully passed and implemented.
3. How will annual leave be calculated under the new Act?
Annual leave will accrue in hours from day one at 0.0769 per contracted hour (4/52). Leave is banked in hours.
4. Can employees cash up their leave?
Yes. Employees will be able to cash up 25% of their total annual leave balance each year.
5. How does the new law affect casual workers and additional hours?
Casual workers and employees working additional hours will receive a 12.5% leave compensation payment on top of wages, rather than accruing additional leave.
6. How will sick leave accrue?
Sick leave will accrue in hours from day one at 0.0385 per contracted hour (2/52).
7. How are public holidays handled?
A new Otherwise Working Day test will determine if a public holiday falls on an expected working day. Alternative holidays will accrue hour-for-hour with each public holiday hour worked.
8. How will leave be paid?
All leave will be paid at an hourly leave pay rate based on base wages; fixed allowances will be paid per normal while employees are on leave.
9. What should employers do now?
Employers must continue to follow the Holidays Act 2003 as nothing has changed yet. It’s sensible to stay informed by monitoring the Bill’s progress and upcoming Select Committee process, but avoid making changes until the law is confirmed. In the meantime, you can start quietly assessing payroll system readiness for hourly accrual, reviewing how your workforce profile might be affected, and planning future communication and training so you’re prepared if and when the Employment Leave Act becomes law.
The replacement of the Holidays Act with the Employment Leave Act is one of the most significant workplace law reforms in recent memory. If passed, it promises to simplify payroll compliance, ensure entitlements are clearer and fairer, and reduce the errors that have plagued employers for decades.
But the change won’t happen overnight. With the Bill yet to be introduced, an implementation period of two years, and carve-outs for specific sectors, we’re looking at a 2028 start date for most businesses.
Until then, the Holidays Act 2003 remains the law of the land. Employers should continue to comply with its requirements, while keeping a close eye on developments in Parliament.
Preparation today will pay dividends tomorrow. By understanding the proposed reforms and planning early, organisations can ensure they’re ready for the Employment Leave Act – whenever it arrives.
 
							
					
															 
			Implementing a new enterprise Human Capital Management (HCM) system isn’t just about configuration. It is about people using it confidently and the system performing under real-world conditions.
As your project moves from build to business-facing phases, training and testing become the proving ground of your investment.
This is where capability is built, risks are exposed early, and confidence is created, paving the way for a smooth go-live.
This part of our multi-part implementation guide explains how to structure training and testing to de-risk your HCM project, meet New Zealand compliance requirements, and prepare your workforce for success.
5. Track progress with gates, user stories, and dashboards.
Training and testing aren’t “end of project” tasks. They are core delivery workstreams that start well before go-live.
They ensure that:
Business stakeholders can confidently sign off readiness. This builds directly on the foundation explained in the previous article, Provisioning, build and vendor testing (part 4), where your system is stabilised and handed to the business for the first time. Without that preparation, effective training and testing cannot happen.
“Training builds capability. Testing builds confidence. Together, they are the real measure of readiness for go-live.”
Training should be delivered in phases, not crammed into a one-off workshop. Each phase builds capability at the right time, for the right people.
Train administrators (typically Payroll and HR specialists) first so they can lead testing. Go beyond navigation. Cover:
Well-trained admins become your first line of support and your first testers, validating business-critical logic before involving wider audiences.
Once the system passes initial scenario testing, train business unit champions, people managers, and operational leads. They’ll help design and execute UAT, so they must understand:
Early involvement builds ownership and advocacy, reducing resistance during rollout.
End-user training happens last, just before parallel runs and go-live, so it reflects the final configuration.
It should cover:
Where possible, have champions or managers deliver this training. Familiar faces improve trust and adoption.
“Train early, train the right people, and keep it practical. That is how capability sticks.”
Scenario testing validates that the system works as designed across every business situation, from the routine to the highly unusual.
It is led by the client project team with vendor support, and should be treated as a full-scale operational rehearsal.
Scenario testing is where confidence is built, but only if it’s structured, documented, and exhaustive. Many organisations undercook this phase. Our article When scenario testing takes a backseat shows what happens when testing is rushed or deprioritised: confidence collapses, defects surface late, and go-live becomes a gamble. Treat scenario testing as a rehearsal, not an afterthought.
“If it is not tested, it is not ready. Treat scenario testing like a full rehearsal.”
UAT is where the business signs off that the system is ready for live use.
Unlike scenario testing (which is theoretical), UAT validates real-world business operations.
The goal is not only accuracy, it’s verifying that the system supports how the business actually operates.
To avoid chaos, testing must be methodical and measurable. Best practices include:
Define clear prerequisites to start a phase (e.g. data loaded, system stable) and conditions to close it (e.g. no payroll-critical defects open).
Write test cases in plain business language and include expected results to avoid subjectivity:
“As a store manager, I want to approve annual leave so the roster updates correctly.”
“Accurate data is not just a nice-to-have for UAT.”
Before UAT begins, refresh data to reflect current real-world conditions so results are accurate and compliant.
Before UAT begins, refresh data to reflect current real-world conditions so results are accurate and compliant. This step links back to Project initiation, scope and design (part 3), where decisions about data migration, employee records, and Holidays Act rules first take shape. Good design at the start makes UAT data refresh far smoother later on.
This ensures training and testing deliver capability, confidence, and control.
Once UAT is complete and all payroll-critical defects are resolved, attention shifts to preparing for parallel runs and final cutover – the bridge between testing and live operation.
This phase is about readiness, not speed. It ensures your system, processes, and people perform as expected under real-world conditions before go-live. Parallel runs, the focus of our next article, simulate live payrolls and operations, validating that everything functions accurately at scale.
Key preparation activities include:
This preparation lays the foundation for a confident transition into the final stage about parallel runs and go-live.
Training and testing are not peripheral activities – they are the proving ground of any payroll or HCM project.
Staged training builds capability at the right time, while scenario testing and UAT validate that the system performs under real-world pressure.
By applying structured testing methods, rigorous documentation, and accurate data, organisations create the confidence needed to move into Part 6: parallel runs and go-live – which we explore next in the concluding part of this series.
Scenario testing validates how the system handles everyday, complex, and edge-case scenarios to ensure it operates reliably in the real world.
UAT is run by business users using real data and real processes, while scenario testing is controlled scripts run by the project team.
Just before go-live, once the system is stable and configuration is finalised.
It ensures testing uses current balances, entitlements, and histories, critical for NZ Holidays Act compliance.
Representatives from HR, Payroll, Operations, and Finance should formally approve UAT completion before go-live.
Talk to Alxemy’s enterprise implementation experts today and make your training and testing phases seamless. Book a Consultation
 
							
					
															To view this protected post, enter the password below:
 
							
					
															 
			Following on from our last article on annual leave entitlements, this one looks at the other side of the leave equation, the payment.
Leave entitlements have two key components: time and money. The last article focused on time (leave balances).
This one focuses on money, the leave pay rates that determine how much an employee is entitled to when they take time off.
And it all starts with three little words: the greater of.
These words are the cornerstone of the Holidays Act whenever annual leave is paid.
Whether the payment is for annual holidays, leave taken in advance, cashed-out entitlement, or termination pay, the rule is the same: pay the employee the greater of Ordinary Weekly Pay (OWP) or Average Weekly Earnings (AWE).
On paper it sounds simple. In practice, it is anything but. Let’s break it down.
“The three little words, ‘the greater of’, are easy to say but difficult to apply correctly.”
At first glance, OWP looks straightforward. It is the employee’s “ordinary weekly pay” at the start of the holiday. But what exactly does that include?
The answer: yes, these can all be included.
This is where many businesses get caught. If you are paying a regular allowance, and your contract does not specifically say it stops during leave, that allowance continues to be paid on top of the leave payment. At the same time, it is also included in the OWP calculation. The result? The employee receives the allowance twice. Payroll professionals call this “double-dipping” and it often happens because payroll was not consulted when allowances were introduced.
The Act carves out certain types of payments:
But be cautious. What you think is discretionary may not meet the legal definition. A labour inspector could rule that a payment you assumed was discretionary is in fact regular, and therefore should be included. Section 8(c) of the Holidays Act provides the framework, but interpretation can be risky.
If OWP cannot be determined because of excluded payments, a formula must be applied:
Gross earnings for the last 4 weeks, less excluded payments, divided by 4.
There is also provision for an employer and employee to agree on a special OWP rate, as long as that rate is equal to or greater than the statutory calculation. Importantly, you cannot simply use the base salary in the employment agreement unless it meets the definition.
And if all else fails, Section 11 of the Holidays Act allows a labour inspector to determine OWP. Most employers would prefer to avoid this outcome, as it suggests payroll processes are not compliant.
Key question: How is your system calculating OWP? And how does it handle fortnightly and monthly employees?
“Average Weekly Earnings smooth out fluctuations, but only if you know exactly what counts as gross earnings.”
AWE is designed to capture fluctuations over time. The calculation is:
Gross earnings over the last 52 weeks ÷ 52.
This method smooths out irregularities, but raises another question: what counts as gross earnings?
These decisions matter. Misclassifying payments can either short-change employees or overpay them. Both outcomes create risk, financial for the employer and compliance exposure if challenged by a labour inspector.
Another common issue arises with employees paid fortnightly or monthly. Payroll systems must be able to apply the same rules consistently, regardless of pay cycle. A system that averages incorrectly or overlooks certain earnings can cause significant underpayments.
This is where the Holidays Act leaves employers with less guidance. The Act does not define “leave accrual.” It only defines leave entitlement and leave taken in advance.
Most payroll systems show both entitlement and accrual balances, but many treat them the same way at payout. That can be problematic.
Here’s why:
This can lead to a deficit if the earlier advance payment was higher than the 8% calculation.
“Holiday pay isn’t just about calculation, timing matters too.”
Holiday pay is not just about calculation, timing matters too.
Annual leave payments may seem straightforward on the surface, but the reality is complex. Missteps create compliance risk, employee disputes, and potential financial liability. Systems must be configured correctly, contracts must be clear, and payroll professionals must be involved when allowances or new payment types are introduced.
“The greater of” may sound simple, but applying it correctly is where most payroll mistakes happen. Ensuring your payroll system interprets them correctly is one of the most important steps in building a compliant, trusted workplace.
Written by: Dawn Grant